Skip to main content

Workplace Video Surveillance Laws in Wisconsin

Last reviewed: September 2026

Quick Answer

In Wisconsin, employers may record video in the workplace with certain restrictions. Video recording is permitted in common work areas where employees have no reasonable expectation of privacy, but employers cannot record in restrooms, locker rooms, change rooms, or other private spaces. Audio recording, however, requires all-party consent under Wisconsin's wiretapping law (Wisconsin Statute § 995.50). Employers must disclose video surveillance policies to employees, and violating privacy expectations can expose the employer to civil liability under Wisconsin tort law and potential criminal charges under the wiretapping statute.

Key Facts

  • •Wisconsin employers may record employees with consent or in areas with no reasonable privacy expectation.
  • •Employers cannot record restrooms, locker rooms, or change rooms under any circumstance.
  • •Audio recording requires all-party consent under Wisconsin wiretapping law.
  • •Video surveillance in common areas is generally lawful if employees are notified.
  • •Wisconsin has no specific video surveillance statute; federal law and general privacy principles apply.

Federal Law: The Baseline

Federal law does not specifically regulate workplace video surveillance, leaving employers with broad discretion under common law principles. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq., restricts audio recording but permits video recording in areas where employees have no reasonable expectation of privacy. The EEOC and DOL do not have specific video surveillance enforcement authority, though surveillance that targets protected classes (age, race, gender, disability, religion) can trigger discrimination liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621, or the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101.

The Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2511, creates a federal baseline prohibiting the unauthorized interception of oral communications. States are permitted to impose stricter protections than the federal two-party consent rule. Employers must comply with the stricter of federal or state law. Video-only recording (without audio) is generally unregulated federally, but audio accompanying video is strictly controlled. Some circuit courts have recognized a reasonable expectation of privacy tort claim in the workplace under common law even absent a specific statute, particularly for recordings made in areas where employees have a legitimate privacy interest.

Wisconsin Law: What's Different

Wisconsin law does not have a dedicated video surveillance statute, but employers must comply with Wisconsin's wiretapping law (Wisconsin Statute § 995.50), which requires all-party consent for audio recording of private conversations. This makes Wisconsin a two-party consent state, and any audio component of video surveillance is strictly regulated. Video-only recording in areas without a reasonable expectation of privacy (such as common work areas, sales floors, or customer service zones) is generally permissible under Wisconsin law, but the employer should provide notice to employees.

Wisconsin Statute § 134.43 addresses surveillance in certain facilities and requires that surveillance be conducted in a manner consistent with privacy protections. Wisconsin courts have recognized a common law tort of invasion of privacy, which applies to workplace surveillance that violates a reasonable expectation of privacy (Huskey v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 349 N.W.2d 402). This provides state-level protection exceeding the federal baseline for video recording in private areas such as changing rooms, restrooms, and locker rooms.

Under Wisconsin law, employers are generally stronger than federal law in protecting employee privacy in restrooms, locker rooms, and change rooms. Recording in these areas is prohibited and can expose the employer to criminal charges under Wisconsin Statute § 995.50 (wiretapping/eavesdropping) and civil liability under tort law. Employers must also comply with Wisconsin Statute § 111.36, which prohibits discrimination based on lawful off-duty conduct; surveillance that monitors or restricts lawful off-duty activity can violate this statute. Wisconsin also recognizes whistleblower protections (Wisconsin Statute § 230.85) that may be implicated if surveillance is used to monitor or deter protected speech.

Key Numbers & Thresholds

Wisconsin has no statutory threshold based on employer size for video surveillance restrictions. The reasonable expectation of privacy test applies regardless of company size. Audio recording requires all-party consent at all times under Wisconsin Statute § 995.50. Video recording in restrooms, locker rooms, and change rooms is prohibited without exception. Notification of surveillance should be provided to employees before recording begins to establish lawful expectations. No minimum penalty threshold exists; violations can result in civil damages, injunctive relief, and potential criminal prosecution.

Exceptions & Special Cases

Wisconsin law provides several important exceptions and defenses to video surveillance liability. Employers may record in areas where employees have no reasonable expectation of privacy, including open workspaces, customer service areas, sales floors, and hallways, provided they notify employees of the surveillance policy. Recording in locked facilities accessible only to authorized personnel may qualify for reduced privacy expectations if the employer has a legitimate business reason for the restriction.

Employers may also defend recording in areas where security concerns justify surveillance, such as cash handling areas, server rooms, or inventory storage, but the surveillance must be proportionate to the risk. An employer may also establish a defense if it has provided clear written notice of surveillance policies to all employees before the recording begins. However, this notice does not override the absolute prohibition on recording in restrooms, locker rooms, change rooms, or other areas where a reasonable expectation of privacy is inherent.

Audio recording, however, has no exception except when all parties to the communication have consented. A single-party consent exception does not exist in Wisconsin. This means an employer cannot legally record employee phone conversations, meetings, or private discussions without the knowledge and consent of all participants. An employer's unilateral announcement of a surveillance policy does not constitute valid consent for audio recording under Wisconsin law. Recording of union organizing, protected activity, or whistleblower complaints may also trigger additional liability under state whistleblower statutes even if an employer attempts to rely on a general surveillance notice.

What to Do If Your Rights Are Violated

Step 1: Document the Surveillance Incident

Immediately create a detailed written record of the unauthorized recording. Note the date, time, location, and context of the surveillance (e.g., "Recorded on [date] at [time] in [location] without notice or consent"). Preserve any physical evidence, such as visible surveillance cameras, written policies, or statements from the employer about the recording. Take photographs of camera equipment if visible. If audio was recorded, preserve any evidence of the recording device or software used (e.g., a memo stating the conversation was recorded without consent). Obtain the names and contact information of any witnesses who are aware of the surveillance. Request written copies of any surveillance footage or recordings involving you from the employer, as this may be obtained later through discovery if litigation proceeds. Keep a separate folder containing all documentation.

Step 2: Report Internally and File a Formal Complaint

Review your employer's employee handbook or HR policies to understand the formal complaint procedure. Submit a written complaint to your HR department or direct manager describing the surveillance, the date it occurred, and why it violates your privacy rights. Request a written response and keep a copy of your complaint. If your employer has an ethics hotline or whistleblower procedure, use that as well to create an additional documentation trail. Send the complaint via email so you have proof of delivery and receipt. If the HR department refuses to act or retaliates against you for complaining, document this response in writing as well. Request that the employer provide you with a copy of all video or audio recordings involving you and confirm in writing that future recordings will comply with Wisconsin law.

Step 3: File a Complaint with the Appropriate Agency

For violations of Wisconsin's wiretapping law (audio recording without consent), file a complaint with the Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS) and/or request that local law enforcement investigate under Wisconsin Statute § 995.50. Contact the Wisconsin State Attorney General's Office Civil Rights Division at (608) 266-1865 or visit https://www.doj.state.wi.us/ to file a complaint for invasion of privacy or violation of privacy rights. You may also file a complaint with the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission (WERC) if the surveillance is retaliatory or discriminatory; visit https://werc.wi.gov/ or call (608) 266-7005. Provide the WERC with documentation of the surveillance, the date(s), the employer's name, location, and the legal basis for your complaint (e.g., retaliation, discrimination, violation of privacy rights). The deadline for filing with WERC is typically 120 days from the violation date, but consult the agency to confirm. Simultaneously, gather your documentation and prepare to file a civil lawsuit in Wisconsin circuit court if the agency complaint does not resolve the issue within 90 days.

Step 4: Expect the Investigation Process

If you file with law enforcement, an investigator may contact you to provide a statement. Be prepared to describe the surveillance in detail, including when you first became aware of it and how it was discovered. Law enforcement may issue a subpoena to the employer for video/audio files and records of the surveillance system. The investigation timeline varies but typically takes 2-6 months. If the attorney general's office investigates, they will evaluate whether there is sufficient evidence to pursue a civil violation or criminal prosecution. The employer will be given an opportunity to respond to allegations. You may be contacted for follow-up questions during the investigation. If the investigation concludes without action, you retain the right to file a private civil lawsuit.

Step 5: Consult an Employment or Privacy Attorney

Before pursuing litigation or after an agency complaint has been filed, consult a Wisconsin employment law attorney who specializes in privacy rights or tort law. An attorney can evaluate whether you have a strong claim under Wisconsin's invasion of privacy tort, wiretapping statute, or discrimination laws if the surveillance targeted a protected class. The attorney can also advise on potential damages, including compensatory damages for emotional distress, privacy invasion, and lost wages if you were terminated in retaliation. Wisconsin allows recovery of attorney fees in some privacy violation cases. An attorney can also advise on whether filing a civil lawsuit in Wisconsin circuit court is advisable and can negotiate a settlement with the employer before litigation. Consultations are often free, and many attorneys work on a contingency basis for strong privacy violation claims.

Relevant Agency

Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services

https://dsps.wi.gov/

(608) 266-2112

If you need help understanding your rights or responding to workplace surveillance, consider consulting a Wisconsin employment attorney who specializes in privacy law.

Get notified when employment law changes

Laws change every year. We'll email you when something changes that affects this topic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can my Wisconsin employer record my phone calls without my permission?

No. Wisconsin Statute § 995.50 is a two-party consent wiretapping law, which means all parties to a conversation must consent to recording. Your employer cannot legally record your phone calls, employee meetings, or private conversations without your knowledge and explicit consent. A blanket policy statement that "calls may be recorded" does not constitute valid consent under Wisconsin law because you have not affirmatively agreed. If your employer records your phone calls without consent, they have violated the wiretapping statute and potentially Wisconsin's invasion of privacy tort. You can report this to law enforcement or the Wisconsin Attorney General's Office. Notably, recording only one side of a conversation (the employer's side) may also violate the statute depending on how the recording is made and whether there is an expectation of privacy in the communication.

Can an employer in Wisconsin record video in the workplace without telling employees?

Wisconsin law does not explicitly require an employer to notify employees of video surveillance, but best practice and case law strongly suggest notification is advisable. Video recording in common work areas (such as sales floors, customer service desks, or hallways) where employees have no reasonable expectation of privacy is generally permissible, but only if the employer has provided clear notice of the surveillance policy. Without notice, an employee could argue they had a reasonable expectation of privacy in that space, which would strengthen a privacy tort claim. Video recording in restrooms, locker rooms, change rooms, or other private spaces is prohibited regardless of notification. Recording must also comply with discrimination laws; if video surveillance is used to target or monitor employees based on a protected characteristic (race, age, gender, disability, religion, etc.), the employer violates federal and state discrimination law regardless of notice.

What should I do if I discover my employer is recording me in the bathroom or locker room?

If you discover surveillance equipment in a restroom, locker room, change room, or other area where you have a clear reasonable expectation of privacy, this is a serious criminal violation under Wisconsin law. Stop using that facility if possible and immediately report the recording to local law enforcement by calling the non-emergency police line or 911 if you feel you are in immediate danger. Simultaneously, file a complaint with the Wisconsin Attorney General's Office at (608) 266-1865 or https://www.doj.state.wi.us/. Contact a Wisconsin employment or privacy attorney immediately; recording in private spaces can constitute felony eavesdropping under Wisconsin Statute § 995.50 and is grounds for a substantial civil lawsuit. Do not confront the employer directly or attempt to remove the equipment, as this could compromise a criminal investigation. Preserve any photographic evidence of the camera or recording device. You may also contact the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) if the recording creates a hostile or unsafe work environment.

Can I be fired for complaining about video surveillance in Wisconsin?

No. Wisconsin Statute § 230.85 protects employees from retaliation for reporting illegal workplace conduct, including unlawful surveillance. If you complain about video or audio recording that violates Wisconsin wiretapping law (§ 995.50) or invades your privacy, and your employer then terminates you, demotes you, reduces your hours, or otherwise retaliates, this is illegal retaliation. You can file a complaint with the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission (WERC) within 120 days of the retaliatory action. WERC can order your reinstatement, back pay, and damages. Additionally, if the surveillance was used to monitor protected activity such as union organizing, FMLA use, or whistleblowing, you have additional protections under the National Labor Relations Act and Wisconsin's whistleblower statute. Keep all documentation of your complaint about surveillance and any adverse employment actions that follow, as this creates a presumption of retaliation.

Do Wisconsin employers need to disclose video surveillance in job interviews or employee handbooks?

Wisconsin law does not explicitly require employers to disclose video surveillance practices, but transparency is strongly advisable. An employer that conducts video surveillance without notice faces greater legal exposure because employees can claim they had a reasonable expectation of privacy, even in common work areas. Best practice is to include a clear surveillance policy in the employee handbook that explains where cameras are located, what is being recorded (video only, or audio and video), and the purpose of the surveillance (security, safety, theft prevention, customer service quality assurance, etc.). This policy should be provided to all employees before the surveillance begins and should exclude restrooms, locker rooms, and change rooms, which cannot be recorded under any circumstance. If an employer collects audio, the policy must explicitly state that employees should not expect privacy in phone calls or meetings and that all-party consent is required. A clear, disclosed policy reduces legal liability, though it does not eliminate it if the surveillance violates statutory protections.

Related Topics in Wisconsin

See video surveillance at work laws in every state →

Sources & References

  • Wisconsin Statute section 995.50 — Defines wiretapping and prohibits unauthorized interception of communications
  • Wisconsin Statute section 134.43 — Addresses surveillance and privacy in facilities; applies to video recording
  • Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 — Federal wiretapping law; Wisconsin follows two-party consent rule
  • Wisconsin Constitution Article I, Section 1 — Recognizes inherent privacy rights of individuals in Wisconsin

Informational only. Not legal advice. Laws change — always verify with a licensed attorney.

Editorial standards: This guide is reviewed against primary government sources and cites 4 statutes. Last reviewed September 2026. Scheduled for re-verification by September 2027.

See our editorial policy for how content is created and verified, or report an inaccuracy.