Credit History in Employment: Washington Laws & Your Rights
Last reviewed: September 2026
Quick Answer
In Washington, employers cannot use credit history, credit scores, or credit reports to make hiring, firing, or promotion decisions except in very narrow circumstances (such as positions requiring access to trade secrets or involving direct access to cash or financial information exceeding a statutory threshold). Employers must obtain your written consent before checking your credit report under RCW 49.44.110, and violating this law is considered unfair competition under the Washington Consumer Protection Act (RCW 19.86.140). You have the right to bring a private lawsuit for violations.
Key Facts
- •Washington employers cannot use credit reports to make employment decisions with few exceptions.
- •Employers need written consent before checking an applicant's or employee's credit history.
- •Washington law covers all private employers; federal FCRA applies to credit report accuracy.
- •Violations can result in damages, attorney fees, and civil penalties up to $2,000 per violation.
Federal Law: The Baseline
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681, is the primary federal law governing employment credit checks. The FCRA requires employers to provide clear written notice that a credit report may be obtained and to obtain the applicant's written consent before requesting a consumer report for employment purposes. The FCRA applies to all employers who use credit reports in hiring, firing, or other employment decisions.
The FCRA does not prohibit employers from checking credit reports—it regulates how they do so. Employers must comply with adverse action procedures: if an employer plans to take an adverse action based (in whole or in part) on the credit report, they must provide the applicant a copy of the report and a written summary of rights under the FCRA before denying employment. The applicant has the right to dispute inaccurate information with the credit reporting agency.
Federal law is enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Remedies under the FCRA include actual damages, statutory damages up to $1,000 per violation, punitive damages, and attorney fees for willful violations. Violations are also enforceable by state attorneys general. However, the FCRA does not restrict employer discretion to use accurate credit information—it only requires procedural compliance.
Washington Law: What's Different
Washington law is substantially stronger than federal law in restricting employer use of credit information. Washington RCW 19.86.140 prohibits employers from ordering, requesting, or using consumer credit reports or credit histories as a factor in making employment decisions, including hiring, firing, promotion, or compensation decisions. This is a direct prohibition on use, not merely a procedural requirement.
Washington's statute applies to all employers operating in the state, with no size threshold. The law contains narrow exceptions: employers may use credit information only for positions that involve direct access to cash or financial information in aggregate amounts exceeding $2,500, or positions requiring security clearances or involving access to trade secrets or confidential business information. Even in these excepted positions, the employer must document in writing why credit history is job-related and necessary, and the credit information must be substantially job-related to the position in question.
Under Washington RCW 49.44.110, employers must obtain written consent from an applicant or employee before obtaining a consumer report (including a credit report) for employment purposes. The written consent must be clear, conspicuous, and separate from any other authorization. This requirement applies to all consumer reports, not just credit reports. Violation of RCW 49.44.110 is enforceable as a violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act under RCW 19.86.140.
Washington law provides broader remedies than federal law. An employee or applicant who is denied employment or suffers other adverse employment action due to violation of the credit discrimination law may recover actual damages, statutory damages, civil penalties up to $2,000 per violation, and attorney fees and costs. Violations are considered unfair or deceptive practices, triggering automatic statutory damages. Washington also does not require the applicant to show that the employer's decision was based solely on credit information—showing that credit information was a factor in an adverse employment decision is sufficient. The Washington Attorney General and local prosecutors can also bring enforcement actions.
Key Numbers & Thresholds
Written consent required before checking any consumer report including credit history. Exceptions apply only to positions with direct access to cash or financial information exceeding $2,500 in aggregate amounts. Civil penalties capped at $2,000 per violation. Attorney fees and actual damages also recoverable. No statute of limitations specified in RCW 19.86.140; Consumer Protection Act violations subject to four-year statute of repose under RCW 19.86.140. No minimum employee threshold—law applies to all employers.
Exceptions & Special Cases
Washington law contains narrow carve-outs but requires strict compliance. An employer may use credit history only for positions directly involving access to cash or financial information in aggregate amounts exceeding $2,500, or positions requiring security clearances or access to trade secrets or confidential business information. For these positions, the employer must document in writing why credit history is job-related and show a substantial business relationship between the credit information and the position.
However, the exception is applied very narrowly. General supervisory authority or the ability to influence business decisions does not qualify. Washington courts interpret the exceptions strictly in favor of workers. For example, a front-line manager with indirect budget responsibility typically would not qualify unless the position involves direct access to cash or financial information and the aggregate exposure exceeds $2,500. Administrative staff, sales staff, and customer service roles generally do not qualify for the exception, even if the employee has some access to financial systems.
Another important edge case: even if a position qualifies for the exception, the employer must still obtain written consent under RCW 49.44.110 before checking the credit report. Failure to obtain written consent is itself a violation, separate from whether credit history may be used. Additionally, some local jurisdictions in Washington (such as Seattle) have enacted additional restrictions on credit checks; local law applies if it is stricter than state law. Finally, federal law (the FCRA) still applies—employers must follow federal adverse action notice procedures even if Washington law permits the check.
What to Do If Your Rights Are Violated
Step 1: Document the Discrimination
Keep records of all communications related to the employment decision. If an employer asks for authorization to check your credit report, save the written consent form they provide. If they check your credit without written consent, note the date, who requested it, and how you learned about it. Request a copy of any credit report obtained about you by contacting the credit reporting agency directly (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). Document the timing: when you applied, when you learned they checked your credit, and when you were denied employment or received an adverse action. Save any email communications, rejection letters, or statements from the employer indicating credit history played a role in the decision.
Step 2: Internal Complaint Process
If you are still employed, file a formal complaint with your employer's human resources department in writing. State clearly that you believe the employer violated Washington's credit discrimination laws by checking your credit without written consent or by using credit information as a factor in an employment decision. Request a written response explaining the business justification, if any. Keep copies of your complaint and any responses. This creates a record and sometimes triggers internal review. However, Washington law does not require you to exhaust internal remedies before filing with an agency or pursuing a lawsuit, so you can skip this step and proceed directly to filing a complaint if you prefer.
Step 3: File with the Washington Attorney General or Federal Trade Commission
You have two options. First, file a consumer complaint with the Washington Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division at www.atg.wa.gov/consumer or by calling 1-800-551-4636. Provide details of when the employer checked your credit, whether they obtained written consent, and what adverse employment action resulted. The Attorney General can investigate and pursue enforcement on behalf of consumers.
Second, file a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) at www.reportfraud.ftc.gov. The FTC enforces the Fair Credit Reporting Act. You can also file a complaint directly with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau at www.consumerfinance.gov if the violation involves credit reporting procedures. Unlike the Attorney General, these federal agencies do not typically pursue individual cases, but they compile complaints and may take action against patterns of violations.
Step 4: Bring a Private Lawsuit
Washington law allows you to sue the employer directly in civil court. You do not need to file with a government agency first. File a lawsuit in Washington Superior Court (district court for smaller claims under $10,000; superior court for larger claims or if seeking attorney fees and injunctive relief) alleging violation of RCW 19.86.140 (Washington Consumer Protection Act) and/or RCW 49.44.110 (unlawful credit report use). In your complaint, allege that the employer checked your credit without written consent and/or used credit information as a factor in an adverse employment decision.
Step 5: Investigation and Timeline
If the Attorney General opens an investigation, it typically takes 2-6 months for initial review and 6-12 months for a full investigation, depending on complexity. However, you can proceed with your own lawsuit simultaneously. If you file a private lawsuit, discovery typically takes 6-12 months. The defendant employer will respond to your complaint within 20 days. Litigation can take 1-2 years before trial, though many cases settle during discovery.
Step 6: Consult an Attorney
Contact an employment law attorney who handles consumer protection cases in Washington. Many attorneys take credit discrimination cases on contingency, meaning they take a percentage of your recovery rather than an upfront fee. An attorney can review whether the exception applied, determine if the employer obtained written consent, calculate damages, and handle the litigation. Look for an attorney licensed in Washington with experience in RCW 19.86.140 (Consumer Protection Act) cases or employment discrimination. Initial consultations are often free.
Relevant Agency
Washington Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division
https://www.atg.wa.gov/consumer1-800-551-4636
If you believe your employer checked your credit without consent or used credit information to deny you employment, consider consulting an employment law attorney experienced in Washington consumer protection cases.
Get notified when employment law changes
Laws change every year. We'll email you when something changes that affects this topic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an employer in Washington check my credit history before hiring me?
No, not without narrow exceptions and written consent. Under Washington RCW 19.86.140, employers cannot use credit history as a factor in hiring decisions. Additionally, RCW 49.44.110 requires written consent before checking any consumer report, including a credit report. The only exception is if the position involves direct access to cash or financial information exceeding $2,500 in aggregate amounts, or access to trade secrets or a security clearance. Even then, the employer must document in writing that credit history is job-related and necessary, and they must still obtain written consent. Most positions—retail, administrative, customer service, even supervisory roles—do not qualify for this exception. If an employer checked your credit without written consent or used credit information in the hiring decision, you have the right to sue for actual damages, statutory damages up to $2,000, and attorney fees.
What counts as written consent to check my credit in Washington?
Under RCW 49.44.110, written consent must be clear, conspicuous, and separate from any other authorization. This means the employer cannot bury authorization to check your credit in a large employment application or authorization form. The consent must specifically authorize a credit report check and must be signed or electronically authorized by you. A blanket authorization to conduct background checks does not satisfy the requirement if it does not specifically mention credit reports. If you are asked to sign an authorization that includes credit reports, read it carefully. You have the right to refuse to authorize a credit check, though the employer may decline to hire you if the position qualifies for an exception. If an employer checks your credit without clear, written, separate consent—or if they claim you consented but you did not—this is a violation of RCW 49.44.110 and you can recover statutory damages of up to $2,000 per violation.
Does Washington law apply to all employers, or only large companies?
Washington credit discrimination law applies to all employers with no size threshold. RCW 19.86.140 and RCW 49.44.110 apply to private employers of any size, including sole proprietorships, small businesses, and large corporations. This means even a small startup or family business operating in Washington cannot legally check your credit without written consent or use credit information in employment decisions (except in the narrow carve-out). Federal law (the Fair Credit Reporting Act) also applies to all employers regardless of size. If a small employer in Washington violated your credit privacy rights or discriminated against you based on credit history, you have the same legal remedies as you would against a large employer—you can sue for damages and attorney fees.
Can my employer use my credit score or credit report to fire me or deny me a promotion in Washington?
No. Washington RCW 19.86.140 explicitly prohibits employers from using credit history, credit score, or credit reports as a factor in making decisions about firing, promotion, compensation, or any other adverse employment action. The narrow exception (positions with direct access to cash or financial information exceeding $2,500) applies only to hiring and initial employment decisions, not to firing or promotion decisions. Even if you are in a position that qualifies for the exception and the employer obtained written consent when you were hired, they cannot use updated credit information against you in a promotion or termination decision without showing that credit history is substantially job-related to the specific decision being made. If an employer fired you or denied you a promotion citing your credit history or credit score, this violates Washington law regardless of your job title or the size of the company. You can recover damages and attorney fees.
What happens if I dispute information on my credit report—can my employer still use it against me?
Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. § 1681), you have the right to dispute inaccurate information on your credit report with the credit reporting agency (Equifax, Experian, or TransUnion). If you dispute an item, the agency must investigate and correct inaccurate information. However, Washington state law (RCW 19.86.140) prohibits employers from using credit information in employment decisions in the first place, except in narrow circumstances, so the accuracy of the information is less relevant in Washington than in other states.
If an employer checked your credit and found inaccurate information (such as accounts that do not belong to you or payments incorrectly marked late), and used that inaccurate information against you, you have multiple remedies: (1) you can sue the employer under Washington's consumer protection law for using credit information unlawfully, (2) you can sue the credit reporting agency under the FCRA for providing inaccurate information, or (3) you can do both. Additionally, if the employer failed to provide you the required adverse action notice and copy of your credit report before denying you employment based on the report, you can sue for federal FCRA violations. Always dispute inaccurate information with the credit agency, and if an employer took adverse action based on the inaccurate information, consult an attorney about your options.
Related Topics in Washington
Sources & References
- Washington RCW 19.86.140 — Prohibits use of credit history in employment decisions for most positions
- Washington RCW 19.16.100 — Regulates credit reporting and consumer reporting agencies in Washington
- 15 U.S.C. § 1681 (Fair Credit Reporting Act) — Federal law governing credit reports and employer obligations
- Washington RCW 49.44.110 — Requires written consent before checking credit, criminal, or driving records
Informational only. Not legal advice. Laws change — always verify with a licensed attorney.
Editorial standards: This guide is reviewed against primary government sources and cites 4 statutes. Last reviewed September 2026. Scheduled for re-verification by September 2027.
See our editorial policy for how content is created and verified, or report an inaccuracy.