Color Discrimination Laws in Missouri: Know the Difference From Race Discrimination
Last reviewed: September 2026
Quick Answer
Missouri prohibits color discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act, § 213.010, which protects employees from unfair treatment based on skin tone. This protection applies regardless of race and covers hiring, firing, pay, promotion, and working conditions. You have 180 days to file a complaint with the Missouri Commission on Human Rights (MCHR). The law applies to employers with 6 or more employees, and federal Title VII protection applies to employers with 15 or more employees.
Key Facts
- •Missouri prohibits color discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act, § 213.010.
- •Color discrimination involves unfair treatment based on skin tone, not just race.
- •File complaints with Missouri Commission on Human Rights (MCHR) within 180 days.
- •MCHR investigates and can order reinstatement, back pay, and compensatory damages.
- •Both state and federal law (Title VII) protect Missouri workers from color discrimination.
Federal Law: The Baseline
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, prohibits employment discrimination based on color, defined as the lightness, darkness, or other characteristic of skin pigmentation. The federal law applies to employers with 15 or more employees, employment agencies, labor unions, and apprenticeship programs. Color discrimination is distinct from race discrimination and protects individuals regardless of their racial category—meaning two employees of the same race can bring color discrimination claims against each other based on skin tone differences.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces Title VII. Prohibited conduct includes discrimination in hiring, firing, compensation, job placement, promotion, discipline, assignments, training, and all other terms and conditions of employment. Color discrimination claims can be based on explicit policies, harassment, or disparate treatment. Remedies under federal law include back pay, front pay, reinstatement, compensatory damages for emotional distress, and punitive damages in cases of intentional discrimination by large employers.
The burden shifts: an employee first establishes a prima facie case (applied for position, qualified, not hired, position filled by someone else or remained open). The employer then must articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the adverse action. The employee must then prove the stated reason is pretext for discrimination. Federal law does not require proving intent to discriminate if the policy has a disparate impact.
Missouri Law: What's Different
Missouri's Human Rights Act, § 213.010, provides broader protection than Title VII in one critical respect: it covers employers with only 6 or more employees, whereas federal Title VII requires 15 or more. This means smaller Missouri employers are subject to state color discrimination law when they would escape federal coverage.
Missouri § 213.065 defines unlawful employment practices to include discrimination in hiring, firing, compensation, conditions of employment, and references based on protected characteristics including color. Missouri courts and the MCHR interpret color discrimination identically to federal standards—meaning the case law from both systems applies. Color is treated as a distinct protected class from race, allowing claims based solely on skin tone variations within the same racial group.
Missouri's burden-shifting framework mirrors federal law but with one procedural advantage: the MCHR can conduct investigations and issue findings before litigation becomes necessary. The state agency has authority to compel testimony, issue subpoenas, and negotiate settlements. Missouri allows compensatory damages for emotional distress, humiliation, and reputational harm, and can order reinstatement or front pay if the employee is unable or unwilling to return.
Missouri does not require administrative exhaustion before filing in state or federal court, but filing with MCHR tolls (pauses) the federal 180-day filing deadline for EEOC charges. State law allows claims to proceed in Missouri courts under the Human Rights Act even after EEOC closure. Remedies under state law include back pay with interest, reinstatement, promotion, compensatory damages, attorney fees, and costs. Punitive damages are available if the employer's conduct was reckless or deliberate.
Key Numbers & Thresholds
Missouri covers employers with 6 or more employees (state law); federal Title VII covers employers with 15 or more employees. File a complaint with Missouri Commission on Human Rights within 180 days of the discriminatory act. Federal EEOC charges must be filed within 180 days in non-deferral states (300 days in deferral states); Missouri is a deferral state, extending the federal deadline to 300 days. MCHR investigation typically concludes within 180 days but can extend. Statute of limitations for state court action is 5 years from the discriminatory act under Missouri § 213.111.
Exceptions & Special Cases
Missouri law does not apply to the federal government, military, Native American tribes, or businesses operating primarily on Native American reservations. § 213.010(2) excludes religious organizations hiring clergy or religious educators, allowing faith-based hiring and firing decisions. The bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) defense permits discrimination in narrow circumstances where color is essential to job performance—this is rarely successful and applies only when no reasonable alternative exists.
Missouri recognizes the legitimate, non-discriminatory reason (LNDR) defense: if an employer articulates a valid, documented business reason for an employment decision that is applied consistently, the discrimination claim fails unless the employee proves pretext. This defense requires the employer to show the reason was the true basis for the action, not merely a facade. Common valid defenses include superior qualifications of another applicant, documented performance problems, legitimate seniority systems, merit-based compensation systems, and disciplinary policies applied uniformly.
At-will employment does not shield discrimination: Missouri is an at-will employment state, but employees can still be fired "for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason at all"—except a discriminatory reason. Color discrimination as the sole or motivating factor for termination violates the law even in at-will contexts. Employer actions taken on grounds explicitly permitted by statute (religion, gender for clergy roles, legitimate occupational qualifications) fall outside liability. Affirmative action programs designed to remedy past discrimination may be defensible if narrowly tailored and not applied as a blanket preference.
What to Do If Your Rights Are Violated
Step 1: Document the Discrimination. Keep detailed records of every discriminatory incident: dates, times, locations, what was said or done, who was present, and how it affected you. Preserve emails, messages, performance evaluations, pay stubs, and internal communications. Document your own performance and qualifications (performance reviews, emails showing good work, attendance records). Screenshot discriminatory social media posts or comments if workplace-related. Save hiring or promotion announcements if you were passed over. Create a timeline of events showing a pattern rather than isolated incidents. Store copies in a personal location outside work systems in case you lose access.
Step 2: Pursue Internal Complaint (Not Legally Required but Strategically Important). Before filing externally, report the discrimination to your HR department or management in writing (email or formal letter). Keep the complaint factual and specific: date, what happened, who was involved, how it harmed you, and what remedy you seek (correction of behavior, reinstatement, compensation). Send via email so you have proof of delivery and timing. Request a written response and timeline for investigation. Document their response or lack thereof. Internal complaints matter because they: (1) give the employer a chance to fix the problem immediately, (2) create evidence of notice if litigation becomes necessary, (3) demonstrate your good faith, and (4) sometimes toll statute of limitations.
Step 3: File with Missouri Commission on Human Rights (MCHR). You have 180 days from the date of discrimination to file. Submit a complaint through the MCHR website (www.mo.gov/mchr) or by mail to: Missouri Commission on Human Rights, 3315 West Truman Boulevard, Jefferson City, MO 65109. Include: your name and contact information, employer name and address, date(s) of discrimination, detailed description of what happened, how color discrimination played a role, what outcome you want, and whether you've filed with EEOC. The complaint need not be lengthy or perfectly detailed initially. If you file with EEOC, filing with MCHR (or vice versa in deferral states) is automatic under work-sharing agreements, so inform EEOC you prefer MCHR handling. Note: Filing MCHR stops the clock on your 300-day federal deadline.
Step 4: MCHR Investigation Process. MCHR will send you a receipt of complaint and assign an investigator. The agency notifies the employer (respondent) and requests a written response. The investigator then interviews you, the employer, witnesses, and collects documents. Expect this phase to take 60–180 days depending on complexity and caseload. You may be asked to provide additional evidence, employment records, and witness contact information. Cooperate fully: failure to respond to MCHR requests can result in case closure. The investigator does not determine guilt; they assess whether probable cause exists to believe discrimination occurred. If probable cause is found, MCHR will attempt conciliation (negotiated settlement). If conciliation fails, MCHR issues a charge of discrimination, and the case can proceed to hearing before an administrative law judge or proceed to state or federal court.
Step 5: Consult an Attorney. Contact an employment law attorney as soon as possible—not after MCHR investigation ends. An attorney can: (1) advise whether your complaint is strong, (2) ensure evidence is properly preserved, (3) identify additional claims (retaliation, hostile work environment, etc.), (4) represent you in MCHR proceedings and mediation, and (5) file in state or federal court if necessary. Look for an attorney licensed in Missouri with experience in discrimination and employment law. Many offer free initial consultations. Ask whether they charge contingency (payment only if you win or settle) or hourly rates. An attorney becomes essential if the employer retaliates after you file (termination, discipline, hostile treatment), if damages exceed $10,000, or if the case is complex with multiple alleged discriminatory acts.
If you believe you have experienced color discrimination at work, consider connecting with an employment law attorney in Missouri who can evaluate your situation and advise on your rights under state and federal law.
Get notified when employment law changes
Laws change every year. We'll email you when something changes that affects this topic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is color discrimination different from race discrimination in Missouri?
Yes. Color discrimination is distinct from race discrimination under both Missouri law and federal Title VII. Race refers to an employee's ethnic origin (African American, Caucasian, Asian, Native American, etc.), while color refers to the lightness or darkness of skin tone. An employee can experience color discrimination from someone of the same race if they are treated unfairly because of their skin tone. For example, two African American employees can bring color discrimination claims against each other or their employer based on skin tone differences. Missouri law protects both categories separately, meaning you can allege color discrimination alone without alleging race discrimination. Courts have recognized that color discrimination cases often involve microaggressions, exclusion from social events, assignment to different roles, or pay disparities based on perception of skin tone rather than overt racial classification.
What is the difference between filing with MCHR and filing with the EEOC in Missouri?
Missouri is a "deferral state" under the Title VII agreement with the EEOC, meaning you can file with either agency and they share information. If you file with MCHR, you have 180 days from the discriminatory act. If you file with EEOC directly, you have 300 days (extended from 180 because Missouri defers to MCHR). Filing with MCHR does not prevent you from later filing with EEOC; in fact, MCHR will automatically refer your case to EEOC after 60 days of inactivity or upon closure. Filing with MCHR keeps your complaint in Missouri's system, which may be advantageous if you prefer state court litigation or state remedies. Filing with EEOC is necessary if you later want to pursue federal court litigation. Most employment lawyers file with MCHR first (180-day deadline) and then file with EEOC within the 300-day window to preserve both options. MCHR investigations are typically free; EEOC charges are always free.
Can my employer retaliate against me in Missouri for filing a color discrimination complaint?
No. Missouri § 213.070 explicitly prohibits retaliation for filing a complaint, testifying, or participating in MCHR investigations. Retaliation includes termination, demotion, pay reduction, shift changes, undesirable work assignments, discipline, or harassment in response to your complaint. If you file a discrimination complaint on Thursday and are fired on Friday, courts presume retaliation due to temporal proximity (closeness in time). Retaliation claims are separate from the underlying discrimination claim and are easier to prove because you only need to show: (1) you engaged in protected activity (filed a complaint), (2) your employer knew about it, and (3) an adverse employment action followed. Your employer cannot require you to drop the complaint as a condition of employment or impose informal punishment like exclusion from meetings or undesirable assignments. If you experience retaliation after filing, document it immediately and inform MCHR, as it strengthens your case significantly.
How much money can I receive if I win a color discrimination case in Missouri?
Damages in Missouri color discrimination cases include back pay (lost wages from termination or demotion, calculated from the date of violation to trial), front pay (if reinstatement is not feasible), compensatory damages for emotional distress, humiliation, and reputational harm (typically $5,000–$50,000+ depending on severity and duration of discrimination), interest on back pay, attorney fees and costs (if you prevail), and punitive damages if the employer's conduct was reckless or deliberate. There is no statutory cap on compensatory damages in Missouri under the Human Rights Act. If your case proceeds to federal court under Title VII, damages are capped at $50,000–$300,000 depending on employer size (larger employers face higher caps). Back pay is calculated by determining your lost earnings minus any interim earnings or income you could have earned with reasonable diligence. If you were terminated and found comparable work, damages are reduced by that interim earnings. Emotional distress damages require evidence of psychological harm, medical treatment, and impact on daily life.
Do I have to prove my employer intended to discriminate based on color, or is disparate impact enough in Missouri?
Missouri recognizes both theories. Intentional discrimination (disparate treatment) is the primary theory: you must show the employer treated you worse because of your color. Disparate impact is a secondary theory used when a facially neutral policy (like a height requirement or dress code standard) has a disproportionate negative effect on a protected group and the employer cannot justify it as job-related and necessary. For example, if an employer enforces a grooming code that prohibits natural hair styles worn primarily by darker-skinned employees, that could constitute disparate impact discrimination even without evidence of intentional animus. In practice, most color discrimination cases involve disparate treatment—direct evidence of bias, comments about skin tone, or differential treatment. Disparate impact is harder to prove but does not require showing intent. You benefit from burden-shifting: once you establish a prima facie case (you applied, were qualified, not hired/promoted, and someone else was), the burden shifts to the employer to explain the decision. If their explanation seems pretextual, you can win even without direct evidence of bias.
Related Topics in Missouri
Sources & References
- Missouri Human Rights Act, § 213.010 — Establishes color as protected class in employment
- 42 U.S.C. § 2000a-2(a) (Title VII of Civil Rights Act) — Federal prohibition on color discrimination in employment
- Missouri § 213.065 — Defines unlawful employment practices including color discrimination
- EEOC Compliance Manual Section 15 (Color Discrimination) — Federal guidance on color discrimination enforcement standards
Informational only. Not legal advice. Laws change — always verify with a licensed attorney.
Editorial standards: This guide is reviewed against primary government sources and cites 4 statutes. Last reviewed September 2026. Scheduled for re-verification by September 2027.
See our editorial policy for how content is created and verified, or report an inaccuracy.