Race Discrimination Laws in Minnesota: Know Your Rights
Last reviewed: July 2026
Quick Answer
Under Minnesota Statute § 363A.09, it is illegal for employers to discriminate against employees based on race or color in hiring, firing, compensation, or any other employment term or condition. Minnesota applies this law to all employers with one or more employees, which is broader than federal Title VII (which covers 15+ employees). You have 300 days to file a discrimination charge with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.
Key Facts
- •Minnesota law prohibits race discrimination in hiring, firing, pay, and all employment terms.
- •Employers with one or more employees must comply with Minnesota Human Rights Act protections.
- •You have 300 days from the discriminatory act to file a charge with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.
- •Remedies include back pay, front pay, reinstatement, attorney fees, and damages up to $50,000 or more.
- •Racial slurs, segregation, exclusion from opportunities, and harassment based on race are all illegal in Minnesota.
Federal Law: The Baseline
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, prohibits discrimination in employment based on race or color. The law applies to employers with 15 or more employees on the payroll for each working day in 20 or more calendar weeks. Title VII covers all aspects of employment including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, training, discipline, and working conditions.
Race discrimination under Title VII includes not only intentional discrimination based on an individual's race but also facially neutral policies that have a disproportionate impact on employees of a particular race. This includes discrimination based on physical characteristics associated with race, such as hair texture or hairstyle, and discrimination based on association with individuals of a particular race.
42 U.S.C. § 1981 provides an additional federal remedy, guaranteeing all persons the same right to contract, which includes employment contracts, on equal terms regardless of race. Section 1981 claims do not have the same employer size requirement as Title VII and allow for unlimited compensatory and punitive damages.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces Title VII. Under the charge-filing process, employees must file a charge within 180 days (or 300 days in deferral states like Minnesota) of the discriminatory act. The EEOC investigates and may attempt conciliation. If the EEOC issues a right-to-sue letter, the employee may file a lawsuit in federal court. Remedies include back pay, front pay, reinstatement, compensatory damages, and in some cases punitive damages up to $300,000 for large employers.
Minnesota Law: What's Different
Minnesota Statute § 363A.09 prohibits discrimination in all aspects of employment, including hiring, firing, compensation, terms, conditions, and privileges of employment, based on race or color. Critically, Minnesota's law applies to all employers with one or more employees, making it significantly broader than federal Title VII, which covers only employers with 15 or more employees. This means small business owners and nonprofit organizations in Minnesota cannot legally discriminate based on race even if they fall below the federal threshold.
Minnesota's definition of race discrimination is substantively similar to federal law but with important procedural and remedial advantages for employees. Like federal law, Minnesota prohibits both intentional discrimination and facially neutral policies with a disparate impact on employees of a particular race. Minnesota also recognizes discrimination based on physical characteristics associated with race, including natural hairstyles protected under the CROWN Act principles, though Minnesota has not adopted a specific statutory ban on hair discrimination as some states have.
Under Minnesota Statute § 363A.28, the available remedies in state court are more favorable than federal law in some respects. Employees can recover back pay, front pay, reinstatement, actual damages for emotional distress and harm to reputation, and reasonable attorney fees and costs. The state also provides for civil penalties; however, Minnesota does not award unlimited punitive damages as federal Section 1981 claims do. Instead, Minnesota's damages are capped by the common law principles of tort remedies.
Minnesota also recognizes retaliation claims under § 363A.27, making it illegal to retaliate against an employee who files a discrimination charge, participates in an investigation, or opposes a discriminatory practice. This protection extends beyond the employer-employee relationship to applicants and customers of the employer.
The Minnesota Department of Human Rights (MDHR) enforces state discrimination law. Employees must file a charge with MDHR within 300 days of the discriminatory act, or they may file directly in state court. If an employee files with MDHR, the agency investigates and can pursue enforcement action. MDHR has the authority to award damages, attorney fees, and other equitable relief. Unlike the federal EEOC process, Minnesota employees have the option to bypass the administrative process and file directly in state district court, giving them more control over the timing and forum of their complaint.
Key Numbers & Thresholds
You have 300 days from the date of the discriminatory act to file a charge with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights (vs. 180 days federally in non-deferral states). Minnesota law applies to all employers with one or more employees (vs. 15 or more employees under federal Title VII). Remedies under state law include back pay, front pay, and actual damages; federal Section 1981 claims allow for unlimited compensatory and punitive damages. The Minnesota Department of Human Rights must investigate and issue findings within 120 days of receiving a charge (if agreed to by the complainant and respondent).
Exceptions & Special Cases
Minnesota's broad employment discrimination law has narrow exceptions. The law does not apply to the federal government or federally recognized Indian tribes in their exercise of Indian sovereignty. Religious institutions are exempt when making employment decisions based on religion, but this exemption does not extend to race discrimination claims.
Minnesota recognizes the bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) defense, allowing employers to assert that race is a necessary qualification for a specific job. This is an extremely narrow defense and applies only in rare circumstances such as theatrical productions or authentic cultural activities. Employers cannot rely on customer preference, stereotypes, or assumptions about how people of a particular race will perform.
Anti-discrimination protections do not mandate equal results or proportional representation; they prohibit discrimination in the decision-making process. An employer's use of subjective hiring criteria, reference checks, or background checks that disproportionately impact applicants of a particular race may constitute illegal discrimination if the employer cannot demonstrate job-relatedness and business necessity.
At-will employment principles do not override discrimination protections in Minnesota. An employer cannot fire an at-will employee based on race, even though employers generally have the right to terminate at-will employees for any reason that is not illegal. Race discrimination is one of the explicit exceptions to at-will employment.
Minnesota also recognizes the "mixed motive" doctrine: if an employer's decision was motivated in part by race and in part by legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons, the employee may still win if they prove race was a motivating factor. The burden then shifts to the employer to prove it would have made the same decision based solely on legitimate reasons.
Private right of action is available; employees are not limited to administrative remedies. Employees may file a charge with MDHR or sue directly in Minnesota state district court, or pursue federal claims in federal court. The availability of multiple forums and procedures gives employees flexibility in pursuing relief.
What to Do If Your Rights Are Violated
Step 1: Document everything carefully from the moment you experience or witness racial discrimination. Keep a written record with dates, times, locations, what was said or done, who was present, and how it affected you. Save all emails, text messages, performance reviews, and other written communications that relate to the discrimination. Take screenshots of racist comments on workplace platforms. Document any changes in your job duties, pay, schedule, or benefits that coincide with reporting discrimination. Preserve evidence of your job performance (positive evaluations, awards, successful projects) to establish you were performing well before the discriminatory conduct or adverse employment action.
Step 2: Report the discrimination through internal complaint procedures if your employer has them. Most employers have an HR department or designated complaint process for discrimination claims. Submit a written complaint if possible (email is acceptable) to HR or your direct supervisor's supervisor, clearly describing the discriminatory conduct, dates, and witnesses. Request a copy of the company's discrimination complaint policy and keep it. Request written acknowledgment that your complaint was received. Internal complaints are important because they give employers a chance to investigate and correct the problem, and they establish a timeline that may help your case. However, internal complaints do not eliminate your right to file with the state agency or court.
Step 3: File a charge with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights within 300 days of the discriminatory act. You can file online at www.human-rights.state.mn.us, by mail at Minnesota Department of Human Rights, 540 Park Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55103, or by phone at (651) 539-1100. You will need to provide your name, contact information, employer name and address, the date the discrimination occurred, a description of what happened, and the basis of discrimination (race). You do not need an attorney to file. Filing a charge with MDHR stops the statute of limitations and triggers an investigation. Alternatively, you may file a lawsuit directly in Minnesota state district court without first filing with MDHR; consult an attorney before choosing this route. You may also file a federal charge with the EEOC; filing with MDHR will be cross-filed with the EEOC automatically due to the worksharing agreement between the agencies.
Step 4: Expect the investigation process to take 120 to 180 days, though complex cases may take longer. Once MDHR receives your charge, it will send a copy to the employer and ask for a response. MDHR investigators will interview you, the employer, and relevant witnesses. You will likely be contacted by phone or email to provide additional information and clarify details. The employer will have an opportunity to respond and may provide documents and witness statements. MDHR will request documents from the employer including hiring records, performance evaluations, email communications, and any complaints or investigations related to your claim. During the investigation, you have the right to request a copy of the investigation file. MDHR will issue findings of fact and conclusions of law. If MDHR finds probable cause that discrimination occurred, it will attempt conciliation—a settlement negotiation to resolve the matter. If conciliation fails, MDHR can pursue enforcement action or issue a right-to-sue letter allowing you to sue in court.
Step 5: Consult an employment discrimination attorney as early as possible, ideally before or immediately after filing your charge. An attorney can help you evaluate your claim, gather evidence, navigate the administrative process, and negotiate a settlement. Many discrimination attorneys work on contingency (taking a percentage of your award rather than hourly fees), so you may not need to pay upfront. An attorney can also advise whether to pursue the claim through MDHR, federal court under Title VII and Section 1981, state court, or some combination. If MDHR issues a right-to-sue letter or if 300 days have passed since you filed a charge without resolution, an attorney can file a lawsuit. In litigation, damages may include back pay, front pay, reinstatement, compensatory damages (emotional distress, reputational harm), attorney fees, and costs.
Relevant Agency
Minnesota Department of Human Rights
https://www.human-rights.state.mn.us/(651) 539-1100
If you believe you've experienced race discrimination at work in Minnesota, consider speaking with an employment law attorney to understand your rights and options.
Get notified when employment law changes
Laws change every year. We'll email you when something changes that affects this topic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Minnesota's racial discrimination law apply to small businesses and nonprofits?
Yes. Minnesota Statute § 363A.09 applies to all employers with one or more employees, including sole proprietorships, small businesses with just a few employees, and nonprofits. This is much broader than federal Title VII, which only applies to employers with 15 or more employees. This means even a small business owner in Minnesota cannot legally discriminate based on race, color, or other protected characteristics. If you work for a very small employer that is exempt from federal law, Minnesota state law still protects you from race discrimination.
What counts as racial discrimination in Minnesota—does it have to be obvious?
No, discrimination does not have to be obvious or include slurs. Minnesota law prohibits both overt racial discrimination (such as racial epithets, exclusion from meetings, or assignment to different jobs based on race) and subtle or covert discrimination. Examples include: being passed over for promotion in favor of less qualified candidates of a different race, receiving lower performance ratings than similarly situated employees of a different race, being subjected to more stringent performance standards, having your work product credited to others of a different race, being excluded from informal networking or mentoring opportunities, receiving harsher discipline than others for the same conduct, or being transferred to undesirable positions. Discrimination can also occur based on racial association—for example, if an employer treats an employee poorly because they are in an interracial relationship or have children of a different race. Minnesota also prohibits discrimination based on hair texture and hairstyles associated with racial identity.
If I am fired after complaining about racial discrimination, is that automatically illegal retaliation?
Retaliation based on complaining about discrimination is illegal under Minnesota Statute § 363A.27, but it is not automatically presumed. You must prove that: (1) you engaged in protected activity (filing a discrimination complaint, participating in an investigation, or opposing a discriminatory practice), (2) your employer knew about this protected activity, (3) you suffered an adverse employment action (termination, demotion, pay cut, schedule change), and (4) there is a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse action. If your termination occurred within a short time after you complained—for example, within days or a week—that timing can support an inference of retaliation. However, if months passed, or if you had performance problems documented before the complaint, the employer may argue the termination was for legitimate reasons. Courts consider the entire context. It is wise to document when you complained, to whom, and any adverse changes in treatment afterward.
How much money can I get if I win a race discrimination case in Minnesota?
Under Minnesota law, remedies include: back pay (wages lost from the date of discrimination to the date of judgment or settlement), front pay (future lost wages if reinstatement is not feasible), compensatory damages for emotional distress, harm to reputation, and other non-economic harm, and attorney fees and costs. Minnesota does not cap compensatory damages in discrimination cases. However, punitive damages (awarded to punish an employer for egregious conduct) are not available under Minnesota's Human Rights Act—though they may be available if you also bring a federal Section 1981 claim in federal court. The amount varies greatly depending on factors such as the severity and duration of the discrimination, impact on your career, severity of emotional distress, and whether the employer's conduct was intentional or reckless. Settlements in race discrimination cases often range from several thousand dollars for isolated incidents to hundreds of thousands for cases involving termination, career damage, or prolonged harassment.
Do I have to file a charge with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights before I can sue in court?
No. Under Minnesota law, you have the option to file a charge with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights (MDHR) within 300 days, or you may skip the administrative process and file a lawsuit directly in Minnesota state district court. Many employees file with MDHR because it is free, the agency investigates on your behalf, and it may lead to settlement or enforcement action without litigation costs. However, if you want to move faster or prefer to control the litigation process, you can go directly to court. You can also file a federal charge with the EEOC if you want to preserve federal claims. If you file with MDHR, you must do so within 300 days of the discrimination. If you file in state court, you should consult an attorney to ensure you meet all deadlines and procedural requirements. An employment discrimination attorney can advise whether the administrative or litigation route is better for your specific situation.
Related Topics in Minnesota
Sources & References
- Minnesota Statute § 363A.09 — Prohibits discrimination in employment based on race or color
- Minnesota Statute § 363A.28 — Establishes remedies for discrimination including damages and attorney fees
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e — Federal law prohibiting race discrimination in employment nationwide
- 42 U.S.C. § 1981 — Federal law guaranteeing equal contract rights regardless of race
Informational only. Not legal advice. Laws change — always verify with a licensed attorney.
Editorial standards: This guide is reviewed against primary government sources and cites 4 statutes. Last reviewed July 2026. Scheduled for re-verification by July 2027.
See our editorial policy for how content is created and verified, or report an inaccuracy.