Pre-Employment Medical Exam Laws in Minnesota
Last reviewed: September 2026
Quick Answer
No, your employer cannot require a medical exam before making you a conditional job offer in Minnesota. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Minnesota Statutes section 363A.09, medical exams are prohibited at the pre-offer stage. After a conditional job offer, employers may require a medical exam if it is job-related, consistent with business necessity, and required of all entering employees in the same job category. All medical information must remain confidential.
Key Facts
- •Employers in Minnesota cannot require pre-employment medical exams before a conditional job offer under the ADA.
- •Medical exams after a job offer must be job-related, consistent, and applied equally to all employees.
- •Minnesota law prohibits disability discrimination in hiring and extends ADA protections to employers with 15+ employees.
- •Employers can conduct post-offer medical exams if all entering employees in the same job category receive them.
- •Results must be kept confidential and stored separately from personnel files under Minnesota and federal law.
Federal Law: The Baseline
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), codified at 42 U.S.C. section 12101 et seq., prohibits employers with 15 or more employees from requiring medical exams or asking disability-related questions before making a conditional job offer. Once a conditional offer is extended, employers may require a medical exam if it is job-related and consistent with business necessity, provided the exam requirement applies equally to all applicants in the same job category.
The EEOC enforces the ADA and has issued extensive guidance on medical exam timing and scope. Under 29 CFR section 1630.14, an employer may condition a job offer on the results of a medical exam only if: (1) the exam is required of all entering employees in the same job category; (2) the exam is job-related and consistent with business necessity; and (3) medical information is kept confidential and stored separately from personnel files.
Employers may make initial screening inquiries about ability to perform specific job functions, but cannot ask about the existence, nature, or severity of a disability. The exam must not be more extensive than necessary to determine whether the applicant can safely perform the job. Remedies for violations include back pay, front pay, compensatory damages, punitive damages (up to $300,000 for large employers), attorney fees, and injunctive relief.
Minnesota Law: What's Different
Minnesota law provides protections that track the ADA and, in certain respects, extend further. Minnesota Statutes section 363A.09 explicitly prohibits an employer from discriminating against a qualified individual with a disability in job application procedures, hiring, discharge, compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment. This statute applies to employers with one or more employees, which is broader than the federal ADA's 15-employee threshold.
Under Minnesota law, employers are prohibited from requiring or requesting medical information, genetic information, or disability-related inquiries during the recruitment and selection process unless the inquiry is specifically related to the applicant's ability to perform the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable accommodation. Minnesota Statutes section 181.645 adds another layer of protection by prohibiting employers from requesting, requiring, or purchasing genetic information about applicants or employees, or using such information in hiring decisions.
The key difference between Minnesota and federal law is the employer size threshold: Minnesota protects employees in organizations with just one employee, while the ADA applies only to employers with 15 or more. Post-offer medical exams in Minnesota must still comply with both state and federal requirements—they must be job-related, consistent with business necessity, applied uniformly to all entering employees in the same job category, and kept confidential.
Minnesota also prohibits inquiries about workers' compensation history or requests for applicants to undergo medical examinations before a conditional job offer is made. Violation of Minnesota's disability discrimination statute can result in compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorney fees, and other equitable relief through the Minnesota Department of Human Rights or private civil action under section 363A.32.
Key Numbers & Thresholds
Pre-employment medical exam ban applies to all employers under Minnesota law (one or more employees), and to employers with 15 or more employees under federal ADA. Post-offer medical exams must be given to all entering employees in the same job category—no selective exemptions. Minnesota statute of limitations for filing a discrimination charge is generally four years under section 363A.32, though it may be extended under certain circumstances. EEOC charge deadline is 300 days in Minnesota (a deferral state) when filed with both the EEOC and Minnesota Department of Human Rights.
Exceptions & Special Cases
The pre-employment medical exam ban does not apply to certain narrow circumstances. An employer may conduct a pre-employment medical exam or make disability-related inquiries if: (1) the inquiry is narrowly tailored to assess job-specific abilities and the applicant's ability to perform essential job functions safely; (2) the exam is required by law or regulation (e.g., commercial driver medical certification); (3) the applicant voluntarily discloses a disability and the employer seeks clarification about functional ability; or (4) the applicant is seeking accommodation and the employer needs medical documentation to assess the feasibility of the accommodation.
Employers in certain safety-sensitive positions, such as commercial drivers, pilots, or law enforcement, may be permitted to conduct medical exams before hire if required by federal or state regulation. However, even in these cases, the exam must be job-related and consistent with business necessity. At-will employment does not exempt an employer from ADA or Minnesota disability discrimination laws—the ability to fire for any reason does not include the right to discriminate based on disability.
Unions and collective bargaining agreements do not override ADA or Minnesota protections. Employers cannot require applicants to waive their ADA rights as a condition of employment. Small employers (those with fewer than 15 employees) are exempt from the federal ADA but remain subject to Minnesota Statutes section 363A.09, which has no employer size threshold. Independent contractors are generally not covered, but the determination of independent contractor status is strict and employers cannot misclassify employees as contractors to avoid compliance.
What to Do If Your Rights Are Violated
Step 1: Document Everything. Keep detailed records of what information the employer requested, when, and how. Save all job postings, emails, verbal communications (note the date and what was said), application forms, and any medical forms or exam reports you received. Document any statements by recruiters or hiring managers about your health, disability, or medical status. If you took a medical exam before receiving a conditional job offer, obtain a copy of the exam and any results. Note the date you received the job offer (if any) and the date the medical exam was required.
Step 2: Understand the Internal Complaint Process. Most employers with human resources departments have an internal complaint procedure. Before filing externally, review your employee handbook or HR policies to see if there is a discrimination complaint process. Submit a written complaint to HR or the designated compliance officer, describing what happened, when, and that you believe it violates disability discrimination law. Keep a copy for your records and request written acknowledgment of receipt. This step is not required by law but creates an internal record and may prompt the employer to correct the violation. However, do not delay filing an external charge while waiting for an internal response.
Step 3: File a Charge with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights (MDHR). The MDHR enforces Minnesota Statutes section 363A.09. You must file within 300 days of the violation (this is longer than the federal 180-day deadline because Minnesota is a deferral state). File online at https://mn.gov/mdhr or by mail: Minnesota Department of Human Rights, 540 Park Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55103. You may also file with the EEOC, which will automatically refer your charge to MDHR. Provide: your name and contact information, the employer's name and address, the date(s) of the alleged violation, a description of what happened and why you believe it was discrimination, and the names of any witnesses. There is no filing fee. Once filed, MDHR will send you a charge number and will notify the employer.
Step 4: Expect the Investigation Process. MDHR investigators will contact the employer and request documents, including job descriptions, application materials, recruitment records, and any medical information collected. You may be asked to provide a written statement or be interviewed. The employer will be given an opportunity to respond. Investigations typically take 60 to 180 days. MDHR may issue a "probable cause" determination if it finds reasonable grounds to believe discrimination occurred, or a "no probable cause" determination if it finds insufficient evidence. If probable cause is found, the parties are offered conciliation—a settlement negotiation. If conciliation fails, the case may proceed to litigation or MDHR may issue a right-to-sue letter.
Step 5: Consult an Employment Law Attorney. If you believe you have a strong case, consult a disability discrimination attorney or employment law attorney licensed in Minnesota before or immediately after filing your charge. An attorney can advise whether the employer's conduct violates the ADA or Minnesota law, help you gather evidence, represent you in communications with MDHR or the EEOC, negotiate a settlement, and represent you in court if necessary. Many employment attorneys work on contingency (you pay nothing unless you win). Look for attorneys through the Minnesota State Bar Association (https://www.mnbar.org) or the National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA). Time is critical—while you have 300 days to file with MDHR, evidence can be lost and witness memories fade.
If you believe an employer violated your rights during pre-employment screening, consult with a Minnesota employment law attorney to review your options.
Get notified when employment law changes
Laws change every year. We'll email you when something changes that affects this topic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an employer ask me about my medical history or past health conditions before offering me a job in Minnesota?
No. Before making a conditional job offer, an employer in Minnesota cannot ask you about your medical history, current health conditions, past illnesses, medications, disabilities, or require you to undergo a medical exam. Minnesota Statutes section 363A.09 and the ADA prohibit disability-related inquiries and medical exams at the pre-offer stage. The only health-related question an employer may ask before an offer is whether you can perform the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable accommodation. If you volunteer information about a disability, the employer can ask follow-up questions to clarify your ability to do the job. Any violation could be grounds for a discrimination claim.
What happens after I receive a conditional job offer in Minnesota—can the employer then require a medical exam?
Yes, but only under specific conditions. After making a conditional job offer, a Minnesota employer may require a medical exam if: (1) the exam is required of all entering employees in the same job category (no selective exams); (2) the exam is job-related and consistent with business necessity; and (3) all medical information is kept confidential and stored separately from your personnel file. The employer cannot withdraw the offer based on the exam results unless the results show you cannot safely perform the job's essential functions, and you cannot be reasonably accommodated. The results must be used consistently—if one applicant is disqualified based on a condition, others with the same condition must also be disqualified. If an employer violates these rules, you may file a discrimination charge.
Do small employers in Minnesota have to follow the same pre-employment medical exam rules?
Yes. Minnesota Statutes section 363A.09 applies to employers with one or more employees, with no minimum size threshold. This means even sole proprietors and small family businesses must comply. The federal ADA applies only to employers with 15 or more employees, so small Minnesota employers are not covered by federal law but are bound by state law. This is an important distinction because it means Minnesota workers at very small businesses have stronger protections against pre-employment medical inquiries than workers in other states. If a small employer violates these rules, you can file a charge with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights at no cost.
What if I voluntarily tell my employer about a health condition or disability during the application process in Minnesota?
If you voluntarily disclose a disability or health condition to an employer, the employer may ask follow-up questions to clarify whether you can perform the essential functions of the job and what accommodations, if any, you might need. However, the employer still cannot require you to take a medical exam or undergo additional medical testing based solely on your disclosure unless a conditional offer has been made. The employer must keep the information confidential and cannot use it as a basis to screen you out unless you truly cannot perform the job even with reasonable accommodation. Disclosing a disability does not waive your rights under Minnesota law or the ADA.
If I fail a post-offer medical exam in Minnesota, can my employer take back the job offer?
Only in limited circumstances. Under Minnesota and federal law, an employer can withdraw a conditional offer based on medical exam results only if: (1) the exam reveals that you cannot safely perform the essential functions of the job; (2) there is no reasonable accommodation that would allow you to perform the job safely; and (3) the employer has applied the same standard uniformly to all other applicants in the same job category. The employer cannot withdraw an offer simply because you have a pre-existing condition, take medication, or have a history of illness. If you believe the employer withdrew your offer based on disability discrimination, you can file a charge with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. The burden is on the employer to prove the withdrawal was job-related and consistent with business necessity, not based on disability stereotypes or assumptions.
Related Topics in Minnesota
Sources & References
- 42 U.S.C. section 12101 et seq. (Americans with Disabilities Act) — Prohibits medical exams before conditional job offer stage
- Minnesota Statutes section 363A.09 — Prohibits discrimination based on disability in employment
- Minnesota Statutes section 181.645 — Addresses genetic information privacy and discrimination
- 29 CFR section 1630.14 — EEOC regulations governing timing and legality of medical exams
- Minnesota Statutes section 363A.02 — Defines protected class and enforcement authority
Informational only. Not legal advice. Laws change — always verify with a licensed attorney.
Editorial standards: This guide is reviewed against primary government sources and cites 5 statutes. Last reviewed September 2026. Scheduled for re-verification by September 2027.
See our editorial policy for how content is created and verified, or report an inaccuracy.