Skip to main content

Color Discrimination Laws in Michigan: Know the Difference From Race Discrimination

Last reviewed: June 2026

Quick Answer

Yes, color discrimination is illegal in Michigan under the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2701. The law protects employees from discrimination based on skin tone, complexion, or color-related features, covering all employers with one or more employees. You have 180 days from the act of discrimination to file a charge with the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, and you also have a private right of action to sue directly.

Key Facts

  • Michigan prohibits color discrimination under the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, covering all employers with one or more employees.
  • Color discrimination includes bias based on skin tone, complexion, or features associated with race, even between people of the same race.
  • Michigan employees have 180 days from discrimination to file with the Michigan Department of Civil Rights (MDCR).
  • Remedies include back pay, front pay, reinstatement, compensatory damages, and attorney fees under Michigan law.
  • Private right of action exists; employees can sue employers directly in Michigan courts without exhausting MDCR process.

Federal Law: The Baseline

Federal law prohibits color discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and applies to employers with 15 or more employees. The EEOC enforces Title VII and defines color discrimination as bias based on skin tone, complexion, or color-related physical characteristics, distinct from race discrimination though often overlapping. Title VII prohibits discrimination in hiring, firing, compensation, job training, promotion, and all terms and conditions of employment.

Color discrimination can occur between employees of different races or between employees of the same race (intra-racial discrimination), and courts recognize that color bias intersects with stereotypes and cultural assumptions about which skin tones are more professional or desirable. Federal remedies include back pay, front pay, reinstatement, compensatory damages for emotional distress, and punitive damages if the employer's conduct was malicious or reckless. The EEOC investigates federal charges and must issue a right-to-sue letter before an employee can file in federal court, and the statute of limitations is 180 days from the discriminatory act in most states.

Michigan Law: What's Different

Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2701, provides broader protection than federal law in several critical ways. First, it covers all employers with one or more employees, whereas Title VII applies only to employers with 15 or more employees, meaning Michigan workers at very small businesses have state law protection not available federally. Second, Michigan does not require exhaustion of administrative remedies before filing suit—an employee can bypass the Michigan Department of Civil Rights entirely and sue directly in state court, providing faster access to remedies than the federal process.

The MDCR defines color discrimination as unfavorable treatment based on complexion, skin tone, or color-related characteristics and explicitly recognizes both inter-racial and intra-racial color discrimination. Under MCL 37.2704, it is unlawful for an employer to discharge, refuse to hire, or otherwise discriminate against a person because of color in compensation, job training, promotion, or any other term or condition of employment. The Act covers all employment decisions and also applies to harassment based on color, whether verbal, physical, or environmental.

Michigan remedies are comparable to federal law but the private right of action accelerates relief. Employees can recover back pay from the date of discrimination, front pay if reinstatement is not feasible, compensatory damages for emotional distress and harm to reputation, and attorney fees and court costs. The MDCR can also impose compliance orders and require affirmative action to remedy discrimination. Notably, Michigan recognizes color as a distinct basis of discrimination even when race is not the primary driver, meaning a claim can succeed even if no racial animus is shown if color bias is established.

Key Numbers & Thresholds

Michigan employees have 180 days from the date of color discrimination to file a charge with the Michigan Department of Civil Rights. The Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act applies to all employers with one or more employees (no minimum threshold). There is no cap on compensatory damages for emotional distress or pain and suffering in Michigan color discrimination cases. No statute of limitations applies to private lawsuits if filed after obtaining a right-to-sue letter; however, the MDCR administrative charge must be filed within 180 days of the discriminatory act.

Exceptions & Special Cases

Color discrimination claims are subject to several important exceptions and defenses in Michigan. Employers may defend by showing the adverse employment action was based on a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason unrelated to color; for example, if an employee was terminated for poor performance documented before the discrimination was asserted, the employer may rebut a color discrimination claim if the performance issue is genuine and consistently applied. Bona fide occupational qualifications (BFOQs) are extremely narrow under Michigan law and rarely succeed; an employer cannot require a certain skin tone or complexion for a job unless color is essential to job performance, which is virtually never the case in modern employment.

Michigan recognizes a distinction between individual discriminatory acts and a pattern or practice of discrimination; isolated comments about color that do not affect employment decisions may not support a claim, though creation of a hostile work environment through repeated color-based remarks can constitute unlawful harassment. At-will employment principles do not shield discriminatory terminations in Michigan—an employee may be fired for any reason, but not for a reason that violates the Elliott-Larsen Act. Union employees retain color discrimination rights; collective bargaining agreements cannot waive statutory protections under Michigan law. Statute of limitations defenses apply if a charge is not filed within 180 days of the last discriminatory act; if more than 180 days pass, the claim is barred unless the discrimination was continuing (ongoing harassment or a series of acts). Employers in the public sector are also covered but have different procedural defenses under the governmental immunity doctrine, though color discrimination itself is not immune from liability.

What to Do If Your Rights Are Violated

Step 1—Document Everything: Begin immediately recording dates, times, locations, and specific statements or actions that constitute color discrimination. Keep a detailed written log noting who witnessed the discrimination, what was said or done, and how it affected your employment (denial of promotion, unfavorable assignment, termination, etc.). Save all relevant emails, text messages, performance reviews, and internal communications that show disparity in treatment based on color. Take screenshots of company communications and preserve any written policies you can access. Request and retain copies of your personnel file, payroll records, and written warnings—your color will not change, so comparators of similar conduct by lighter-skinned employees become critical evidence.

Step 2—Internal Complaint Process: Review your employee handbook for the company's discrimination and harassment complaint procedure, and follow it precisely even if you plan to file with the MDCR or sue. Submit a written complaint to Human Resources, your manager's supervisor, or the designated compliance officer, clearly stating you are complaining of color discrimination and describing the discriminatory acts with dates. Request a written acknowledgment of receipt and keep a copy for your records. Do not rely solely on verbal complaints; written documentation creates a record that demonstrates the employer had notice. This step is important because it may toll statutes of limitations in some contexts and shows you gave the employer an opportunity to remedy the violation, which can strengthen a later legal claim and may support a demand for attorney fees if the employer failed to investigate or remediate.

Step 3—File with the Michigan Department of Civil Rights: You may file an administrative charge with the MDCR within 180 days of the discriminatory act; this is the administrative route but is optional in Michigan because you have a private right of action. To file with the MDCR, submit a complaint form available at www.michigan.gov/mdcr, call (313) 456-3700 to request a form or file by mail to Michigan Department of Civil Rights, 110 W. Michigan Ave., Lansing, MI 48913. The charge must include your name, address, the employer's name and address, a description of the discriminatory acts (be specific: dates, statements, actions), and the relief you seek (back pay, reinstatement, damages). Include the names of witnesses and comparators (employees of other colors treated better). You do not need to hire an attorney to file with the MDCR, though counsel is valuable for complex cases. Alternatively, you can file a complaint in Michigan state court or federal court if the employer has 15+ employees; federal court jurisdiction requires diversity of citizenship or a federal question, and federal cases are filed in the U.S. District Court for the appropriate Michigan district.

Step 4—Investigation and Resolution Process: After filing with the MDCR, the department will assign an investigator who will interview you, the employer, potential witnesses, and gather documents. The MDCR investigation typically takes 90 to 180 days, though complex cases may take longer. You will receive a copy of the employer's response and have an opportunity to provide rebuttal evidence. If the MDCR finds probable cause that color discrimination occurred, it will attempt to conciliate (negotiate a settlement) between you and the employer. If conciliation fails, the MDCR will issue a determination and can impose remedies including back pay, front pay, compensatory damages, and injunctive relief. You may appeal an unfavorable MDCR determination to the Michigan Civil Rights Commission. Alternatively, you can request a right-to-sue letter from the MDCR after 180 days (or immediately if investigation is complete) and pursue a civil lawsuit in Michigan state or federal court; Michigan law imposes no cap on damages, unlike some federal limitations.

Step 5—Consult an Attorney: Contact an employment law attorney specializing in discrimination cases as soon as possible, ideally before filing the MDCR charge; many offer free initial consultations. An attorney can evaluate whether your facts support a color discrimination claim, identify additional evidence, advise on the most advantageous forum (MDCR, state court, or federal court), and represent you through investigation and settlement negotiations. Michigan allows recovery of attorney fees and court costs in successful color discrimination cases, so many attorneys work on contingency or reduced-fee arrangements. If your case involves other violations (retaliation, hostile work environment, wage theft), an attorney can identify additional claims that strengthen your position and increase damages.

Relevant Agency

Michigan Department of Civil Rights

https://www.michigan.gov/mdcr

(313) 456-3700

An employment attorney specializing in discrimination can evaluate your case, advise on the best filing strategy, and often work on contingency since Michigan allows recovery of attorney fees.

Get notified when employment law changes

Laws change every year. We'll email you when something changes that affects this topic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does color discrimination have to be based on race, or can it happen between people of the same race in Michigan?

Color discrimination in Michigan is prohibited whether it occurs between employees of different races or between employees of the same race. The Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act protects against discrimination based on complexion and skin tone as a distinct ground, even when race is the same. For example, an African American employee denied a promotion because she has darker skin than another African American candidate—or a lighter-skinned Hispanic employee denied a job because of darker-skinned appearance—both constitute unlawful color discrimination under Michigan law. This intra-racial discrimination is often overlooked but is explicitly covered by the MDCR's guidance and Michigan courts have recognized it. Color bias frequently intersects with stereotypes about which skin tones are more 'professional,' 'trustworthy,' or 'client-facing,' and employers cannot make employment decisions based on these color-coded assumptions.

What is the difference between color discrimination and race discrimination in Michigan?

Although color and race are related, Michigan law treats them as separate protected categories. Race discrimination focuses on ethnic origin, national origin, or genealogy, while color discrimination specifically targets skin tone, complexion, or color-related features. An employee might experience race discrimination (bias against their ethnic group) and color discrimination (bias against their skin tone within that group) simultaneously, or one without the other. For example, an employer might have no bias against Latinos (race) but favors light-skinned Latino employees over dark-skinned ones (color). Proving color discrimination requires evidence that the employee was treated unfavorably because of their complexion or color-related characteristics, which can be demonstrated through comparators (showing lighter-skinned employees were treated more favorably) or through comments about appearance. Michigan law recognizes that colorism—preference for lighter skin—is a form of discrimination distinct from racial animus and is just as illegal.

Can my employer legally give preference to lighter skin tones in hiring or promotions, or is that always color discrimination in Michigan?

Preference for lighter skin tones in hiring, promotions, or any employment decision is color discrimination under Michigan law and is never legal unless color is a genuine occupational qualification (GBOQ), which is extraordinarily rare and has never successfully been applied to color in modern litigation. An employer cannot hire based on aesthetic preferences for lighter skin or assume that customers prefer lighter-skinned employees. If an employer consistently selects lighter-skinned candidates for visible customer-facing roles, this is evidence of unlawful color discrimination even if the employer claims it reflects customer preferences; Michigan law prohibits discrimination based on assumptions about what customers want. Similarly, an employer cannot justify color discrimination by citing an alleged company image or brand identity that favors certain skin tones. Written or unwritten policies that explicitly or implicitly favor lighter complexion (such as 'more professional appearance' defined by skin tone) are per se discriminatory and create liability.

How do I prove color discrimination if the employer denies it and says the decision was for another reason in Michigan?

To prove color discrimination in Michigan, you must present evidence that color was a motivating factor in the adverse employment action. The most direct evidence is statements by decision-makers about your color (e.g., 'you are too dark for client-facing work'), but direct statements are rare. Circumstantial evidence is equally valid and includes: (1) disparate treatment—showing that lighter-skinned employees were treated more favorably in similar circumstances (the 'comparator' evidence is crucial), (2) timing—termination or denial of promotion shortly after color-related comments, (3) pretext—the employer's stated reason (performance, downsizing, customer preference) is false or inconsistently applied to similarly-situated light-skinned employees, and (4) pattern and practice—a pattern of color-based decisions over time. For instance, if you were denied a promotion and the employer promoted a lighter-skinned employee with worse performance reviews, that comparator evidence strongly supports a color discrimination claim. Statistical evidence showing that lighter-skinned employees in your department receive higher salaries, promotions, or better assignments than darker-skinned employees is powerful circumstantial proof. You do not need to prove racial animus; you only need to show color was a motivating factor, and the burden shifts to the employer to prove the decision would have been the same regardless of color.

If I file a charge with the Michigan Department of Civil Rights for color discrimination, can I still sue my employer in court, and what is the timeline?

Yes, Michigan law gives you the choice: you can file with the MDCR, sue directly in court, or do both in sequence. Unlike federal law, filing with the MDCR does not require you to wait for the agency to finish its investigation or issue a right-to-sue letter before suing; you can request a right-to-sue letter immediately after filing an MDCR charge and proceed to court. The critical deadline is 180 days from the date of discrimination to file an MDCR charge; missing this deadline bars an MDCR complaint. However, if you proceed directly to court (Michigan state court or federal court if the employer has 15+ employees), you are not bound by the 180-day window for filing in court, though delay can affect damages and defenses. Many employment lawyers recommend filing with the MDCR first because it is free and may lead to quick settlement, while preserving your right to sue if the MDCR investigation is unsatisfactory or takes too long. Once the MDCR investigation concludes or you request a right-to-sue letter, you can file a civil lawsuit; Michigan courts impose no cap on compensatory damages for color discrimination, unlike some federal limits.

Related Topics in Michigan

See color discrimination laws in every state →

Sources & References

  • Michigan Compiled Law section 37.2701 (Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act)Prohibits discrimination based on color in employment
  • Michigan Compiled Law section 37.2704Defines prohibited employment practices and unlawful discrimination
  • Michigan Administrative Code Rule 408.3101 et seq.Establishes MDCR procedures for investigating color discrimination complaints
  • 42 U.S.C. section 2000a (Title II of Civil Rights Act of 1964)Federal baseline prohibiting color discrimination in employment

Informational only. Not legal advice. Laws change — always verify with a licensed attorney.

Editorial standards: This guide is reviewed against primary government sources and cites 4 statutes. Last reviewed June 2026. Scheduled for re-verification by June 2027.

See our editorial policy for how content is created and verified, or report an inaccuracy.